So the "Christian" registrar (of births, marriages and deaths) who won the right not to have to register the civil unions of homosexuals turns out to have an illegitimate son of her own? I wonder if she's claimed child support for him in the past? Accepted the resources of the state perhaps for the son born outside the wedlock she apparently believes is the sole legitimate place for sexual congress?
Unfotunately such hypocrisy is constant amongst those "religious" people who have nothing better to do than to try to destroy the lives of those of whom they disapprove.
